Minister of Free Inquiry ([info]aethyrflux) wrote,
@ 2004-12-28 01:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: dreaming
Current music:sting, "russians"
Entry tags:ancestral tribute, anthropology, autopoiesis, balance, becoming, channels, collective, communication, complementarity, complexity, complexity theory, conflict, consciousness, cultural evolution, decision, development, dialogue, divination, drinking, drug, ecology, efficacy, emergence, emotion, ethics, evolution, evolutionary biology, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary psycho-biology, evolutionary psycho-socio-biology, evolutionary socio-biology, evolving cooperation, exceeding by delicacy, fallacy, feng shui, game theory, geography, geomancy, goal, habit, heroic cycle, history, human, human emergence, human nature, i ching, ifa, ifestyle, individual, integral revolution, integrity, joseph campbell, kabbalah, ken wilber, monomyth, moral, naturalism, naturalistic fallacy, nature, nutrition, one on one, perennial philosophy, philosophy, physical anthropology, position, process, reciprocal altruism, reproduction, reproductive conflict, self-organizing systems, sex, sexual paradox, storytelling, tarot, the bodhisattva vow, the ethical slut, the great work

ancestral tribute
Since i started this journal, the bio on my info page has read:

"I don't need myself remembered; but what I help create and leave behind is important to me!"

Perhaps i should explain this reference further? Particularly in my study of physical anthropology this semester, i have become acutely aware of why this idea has always resonated so strongly with me...


the cut tags in boldface provide a sampling of the subjects mentioned in this ridiculously long and rambling post:


--


cultural evolution; self-organizing systems; complexity theory; game theory; evolutionary psycho-socio-biology; storytelling and divination throughout history and geography; mutually beneficial relationships between the individual and the collective

Through the process of evolution, primates reached the physiological level of natural selection where their neocortex had grown so large that they found a superior way of adaptation... While other animals relied upon the purely biological methods of natural selection, primates used their cognitive/endocrine/dactylic functions to take advantage of cultural methods of adapting their environments and improving their living conditions. Thus, my own life has been improved through the contributions not only of biology, but also by the development and transmission of learned behaviours. I am indebted to all of our ancestors' utilization of social and technological systems to improve our fitness and ensure our survival throughout all of history (particularly since the Pleistocene, but more so in the Holocene, and exponentially so since the Industrial Age). I believe that the ethical way to honour these gifts is to return them in kind by contributing to the evolution of culture.

This is why self-organizing systems, complexity theory, game theory, and evolutionary psycho-socio-biology have always been so fascinating to me. Obviously, there is an interdependent relationship between the "super-organic" phenomenae of culture and the physiological aspects of our existence; but this only serves to further my point. The longer that I study the development of science, the more i am faced with my own obligation to fulfill my duty to the community. My studies of storytelling and divination throughout history and geography have further convinced me of the prevalence of this ethical philosophy of mutually beneficial relationships between the individual and the collective:

The Great Work
The Perennial Philosophy
The Heroic Cycle / Monomyth / Joseph Campbell
Ken Wilber / Integral Revolution
I Ching / Feng Shui
Ifa / Geomancy
Tarot / Kabbalah
The Bodhisattva Vow


--


reciprocal altruism; one on one dialogue & even more complex communication channels; The Ethical Slut; Sexual Paradox: Complementarity, Reproductive Conflict and Human Emergence: The Naturalistic Fallacy, Human Nature, and Evolutionary Ethics

Based on the idea of reciprocal altruism, I still believe that love is not a starvation economy. Although I also recognize that the basis of all relationships is a dialogue between two people -- and the communication channels only get exponentially more complex from there, as the recent jest by [info]trans_simian clearly indicates. I have previously explored similar ideas in my post concerning Triangling, Projective Identification, & Group Dynamics.

Of course, the sexual strategies that humans employ in their communities bring the particular ethics of each individual into question. And as Jan Norman points out in her essay, "The Evolutionary Theory of Sexual Attraction,

` ` Fortunately, humans are not destined to merely follow their evolutionarily programmed callings to mate. Our advanced cognitive abilities allows us avoid blindly following physiological and emotional urges by anticipating the long-term outcomes of our behaviors. Yet, in spite of our human pride in being rational, logical, and ethical in love , our behaviors are often surprisingly and disappointingly, imitative of mating behaviors of other members of the animal kingdom. Our superior cognitive abilities may present a mixed blessing, allowing us to delude ourselves by rationalizing irrational acts and choices. Attraction messages from the primitive part of our brains pushing us to pursue seemingly superficial traits and sometimes inappropriate partners often seem so right at the time. As David Meyers (1995) states, sex differences and mate selection behaviors which may have once been helpful in ensuring the survival of our primitive ancestors and their young may no longer be adaptive and useful in today's world. ' '

The situations with which modern individuals are faced can be confusing to say the least. In the interest of understanding and improving these relationships, for some time now, I have been enjoying the book, "The Ethical Slut," which brings the crucial nature of ethics in sexual relationships back into focus. There are many classic pieces of advice contained within its pages, such as the infamous list of "How To Fuck Up!"

There is also an amazing work called, "Sexual Paradox: Complementarity, Reproductive Conflict and Human Emergence," which I cannot possibly praise enough for its inspiration to me, ever since I found it while researching for my post about gender and sexuality.
The chapter which to me seems most appropriate to reference, is called, "The Inescapable Game of Life, starting in the section entitled, "The Naturalistic Fallacy, Human Nature, and Evolutionary Ethics," and specifically beginning around the section which reads:

` ` Our future viability is not just a function of cultural or economic expectations which are notoriously unstable and in the absence of an understanding of sociobiology prone to self-deceptive pitfalls which could be lethal. The evolutionary evidence both from our past and from other species, all who have had to pass the evolutionary test over cumulative lifetimes is the best indication we can hope to avail ourselves of in assessing our own directions and course of action in future. Neither does this determine any social course of action based on biological grounds, but rather gives a wider deeper context in which to understand culture and our own evolutionary decisions. ' '


--


the development of ethics as a philosophical process one may use to question the rationale and efficacy of moral decisions; ethical statements: essentially based on emotional positions; Exceeding by delicacy; becoming conscious of our eating/drinking/sex/drug/etc. habits & developing a more nutritious/well-balanced/ethical lifestyle

I consider the development of ethics to be a philosophical process one may use to question the rationale and efficacy of moral decisions. The unexamined life is indeed not worth living, so I will continue to encourage everyone of us (certainly including myself), to challenge our own base assumptions. I trust that we will learn to balance a healthy amount of skepticism with a joyous degree of integrity! And I know that it will involve some juggling in the process... which I will endeavor to enjoy with a hearty sense of humor, and ample slack to share with my friends,

Catching up on lj last night, I read [info]m7superstar's post, on hedonism, which was inspired by [info]sea_of_change's post, Pleasure.

This brief essay suggests that morals/ethics are the next logical step after having accepted the laws of nature, aesthetics, and hedonism.

I recently discussed my position on the use of ethics in a thread from a post called, "It can't be wrong if it feels so right."
` ` i concur with the position ... (described in [info]slackananda's post called, Moral, Immoral, Amoral, More) ... of unqualified absolute moralism being repugnant. i generally prefer to use "if...then" statements so that my positions are not perceived as moral ultimatums; but the melting pot of cultures has produced an environment where decisions based on ethical grounds are often unfamiliar between the concerned parties. in the relativistic community we live in, it becomes increasingly apparent that ethical statements are essentially based on emotional positions. this is why i often speak of educating our consciences through learning about different cultures throughout time, and developing a mature responsible ethical system -- basically a utilitarian idea of finding the greatest good for the greatest number. ' '

And concerning hedonism specifically, i have similarly always followed the utilitarian maxim to, "maximize pleasure & minimize pain (within reason)"

If you'll pardon some pestilential thelemic rambling, a certain passage comes to my mind from The Book of the Law:
` ` There is help & hope in other spells. Wisdom says: be strong! Then canst thou bear more joy. Be not animal; refine thy rapture! If thou drink, drink by the eight and ninety rules of art: if thou love, exceed by delicacy; and if thou do aught joyous, let there be subtlety therein! ' ' Liber AL: II, 70

In the the new commentary for this passage, the matter is clearly elucidated in the context through which i am referencing it:
` ` "Exceed by delicacy": this does not mean, by refraining from so-called animalism. One should make every act a sacrament, full of divinest ecstasy and nourishment. There is no act which true delicacy cannot consecrate. ' '

I think that this is actually quite a simple idea, related in flowery prose & archaic poetry, and used as a symbolic reference to spiritual discipline... similar to my attitude towards the various diet crazes: I think that people will become more healthy if they even begin to work on being aware of what they are putting into their bodies... becoming consciously aware of our eating/drinking/sex/drug/etc. habits is the first step towards shifting our learned behaviours towards a more nutritious/well-balanced/ethical lifestyle! If one's actions are devoted to a "higher" cause, then the pleasures will produce a liberation of energized enthusiasm, rather than the guilt and shame of sin-restriction... q.v. The Law of Liberty for more philosophical rationalizations concerning this perspective. Some of the other major roots for these libertine ideals can be found in the work of Rabelais, which has also been particularly inspirational to me recently.


--


Let's transform our lives with cultural evolution!


--


And although I am delirious from sleep deprivation at the moment and i should just go rest, I feel compelled to mention another one of my personal fascinations... which concerns the ethics of slaughter, whether for food, or concerning the value of human life. And, being the idealist that I am, I also believe in non-violent conflict resolution whenever possible... like the Orang Asli.




(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-28 04:14 pm UTC (link)
you are truly a beautiful soul...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]aethyrflux
2004-12-29 04:01 am UTC (link)
"This (journal) is a mirror. When a monkey looks in, no apostle looks out."
- Lichtenberg

on the contrary, your praise in anonymity is humbling...
but please let us continue this dialogue?

in any case, keep up The Great Work!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]copia
2004-12-28 05:58 pm UTC (link)
Will I see you at C's party this Friday New Year's Eve? I certainly hope so.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]aethyrflux
2004-12-29 04:10 am UTC (link)
most definitely, i will be there at C's as early as possible on NYE... it will be lovely to see you again!
i have previous commitments to be out at the creek house before midnight, though.
however, saturday evening, i am gathering a motley crew together to descend upon elysium... and there will be an afterparty, as well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

if you will bring my fscking comics to the creek house for NYE...
[info]nescafe
2004-12-29 09:06 am UTC (link)
I will bring some books that you will probably like. How about:
The Age of Spiritual Machines
The Adapted Mind (Ev Psych and the Generation of Culture)
The Three Pound Universe
Infinity and the Mind
Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
The Mystery of the Aleph: Mathematics, the Kabbalah, and the Search for Infinity
Mapping the Mind

If you have already read any of these, let me know.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]aethyrflux
2004-12-30 02:20 am UTC (link)
that sounds awesome!
incidentally... i had brought some of Alejandro Jodorowsky's comics to games night to share with you for the last couple of weeks, but the first time, you weren't there, and the second time, poor [info]allea was ill.
so, i'll reconnoiter to the creek house and bivouac until you make yourself visible!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]heatherthegreat
2004-12-30 05:58 pm UTC (link)
I think I've said this before but I love to read it when you bring together the many things you've been talking about. It's easy to see the connections in it all.

Arg! I want more more more! More knowledge. More synergy, synchronicity. More connections. I want the whole world's knowledge in my hands. It may be a foolish desire.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]aethyrflux
2004-12-31 01:45 am UTC (link)
yeah, i too have sometimes wondered if i should be more concerned about where the boundary is between healthy fascination and dangerous obsession with synthesizing information

...quoth lovecraft, "there are secrets man was not meant to know!"

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]heatherthegreat
2005-02-28 12:41 pm UTC (link)
That was a great essay, thanks. Two quotes that struck me....

The "gods" in his stories are not gods as we usually think of them, but rather aliens, and primal forces. These entities existed for countless ages before man, and will exist long after he is gone. Their very existence is destructive to our sanity, and they care nothing for humanity. This can be exemplified by a quote from one of his most famous pieces, "The Call of Cthulhu," first published in 1928: "The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far." The narrator of the piece goes on to say that if we knew what really went on in the universe, even in part, we'd either go mad as a society, or break down into a new dark age, eschewing the revelations of science altogether.

it seems that Lovecraft participated in the fear he wrote about... fear of the unknown. if we don't know about it, then it must be bad (harmful to our sanity). We've expanded Einstein's theories and added more on top of that and we have not imploded yet.

Religion, for him placated the masses, and so he created in his works what David Schultz called an "anti-mythology." Mythology's usual function is to show how humanity connects to deity, how deity functions in society, and to explain how the world works. In Lovecraft's stories, however, there can be no connection to god because there is no God, and the beings that are worshipped in God's place (Nyarlathotep, Hastur, Cthulhu, etc.) have no true concern for humanity at all, and will only bring about humanity's destruction if summoned. A close parallel can be drawn between them and modern nuclear weaponry -- they may rule our world, but they care nothing for us. According to S.T. Joshi in H.P. Lovecraft: A Life, "The 'gods' in his tales are symbols of all that lies unknown in the boundless cosmos, and the randomness with which they can intrude violently into our own realm is a poignant reflexion of the tenuousness of our fleeting and inconsequential existence."

this is along the same lines as the first quote but i liked how he explained mythology's uses and how lovecraft developed an anti-mythology. very cool.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]aethyrflux
2005-04-05 04:00 am UTC (link)
We've expanded Einstein's theories and added more on top of that and we have not imploded yet.

and we made it through the cold war without creating a nuclear apocalypse, too!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]aethyrflux
2006-11-30 12:42 am UTC (link)
more Tarot info

(Reply to this)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…